Tethering of the spinal
cord is an insidious cause of worsening incontinence that requires
urgent medical assessment and possibly surgical intervention to
prevent any further deterioration. Clinicians monitoring young people
and adults with spina bifida need to maintain a high degree of suspicion
to ensure the early detection of tethered cord syndrome to help
promote and maintain independent living.
Key issues for clinicians
Clinicians need to consider spinal cord tethering
as a possible cause of change in continence patterns.
Any suspicion of spinal cord tethering should be referred
to a specialist centre for urgent assessment.
Earlier surgical intervention in clinically demonstrated
spinal cord tethering is more likely to result in an improved
long term outcome.
Tethered cord syndrome - an insidious condition Tethering or stretching of the spinal cord in
young people and adults results from fixation of the spinal cord
to inelastic structures. Spinal cord tethering is a major source
of morbidity in spina bifida and clinicians need to be familiar
with its presentation and maintain a high degree of suspicion when
monitoring patients with spina bifida.
In the past, spinal cord tethering was thought of as mainly a condition
affecting only children, especially during growth spurts, but the
condition can occur in people with spina bifida at any age.
Spinal cord tethering is a particularly insidious complication of
spina bifida that can have a major adverse impact on independence
through its effect on mobility and continence. Many causes but consistent presentation The fixation of the spinal cord in spinal tethering
is due to fibrous or lipomatous tissue. In spina bifida this can
be due to a myelomeningocoele, lipomyelomeningocoele, scar tissue,
a fibroadenomatous filum terminale or many other conditions.
Clinical presentation of tethered cord syndrome Symptoms and signs Tethered cord syndrome typically causes a progressive
loss of function at or below the level of the spinal cord defect,
with or without lower lumbar pain.
Regardless
of the particular mechanical cause of spinal tethering, the
spectrum of clinical presentations of tethered cord syndrome
are consistent and should alert the clinician to the need for
IMMEDIATE neurological and neurosurgical referral.
Tethering may occur in young adults at times of growth
spurts, when lengthening of the spinal column can increase spinal
cord tension, but it can occur at any adult age.
Table
3. Characteristics of pain in spinal cord tethering
Pain in lower back
and legs exacerbated by physical activity, especially any
which involves flexion and extension of the lumbosacral
area
Leg pain is often in medial, lateral,
anterior, or posterior aspects of thighs or legs
Groin pain or pain in the genitorectal area is common
Pain is not less when lying supine (as opposed to
disc disease)Straight leg raising causes no difference to
pain
In adults, pain governed by three B signs
(usefulness will depend upon any pre-existing neurological
and orthopaedic disabilities):
inability to sit with legs crossed (like Buddha)
difficulty in bending slightly at the waist with activities
such as washing dishes
holding a baby or light material (< 2.5 kg) at the waist
level while standing
Table
4. Common findings in tethered cord syndrome
Pain (Table 3)
Gait problems, often quite subtle
Progressive urinary incontinence; symptoms include
urgency, frequency and enuresis
Progressive faecal incontinence including urgency,
frequency, and encopresis
Any motor or sensory deficits in lower extremities
Altered sensation in genital regions and during sex
Impotence
Muscle weakness
Muscle atrophy
Hyporeflexia, especially any change in pre-existing
signs
Faecal incontinence
Scoliosis/lordosis
Foot deformities
Skin abnormalities - herald marks
Key diagnostic issue - progressive loss
and change The key diagnostic issue in spinal cord tethering
in young people and adults with spina bifida is a progressive deterioration
in neurological function at or below the level of the defect. This
includes urinary and faecal incontinence.
Spinal
tethering needs to be excluded in the presence of progressive
deterioration of urinary or faecal incontinence.
Neurological deficits in spina bifida are usually
not progressive. Any change in signs requires immediate specialist
assessment. Spinal cord tethering can also occur in adults with
no known past history of spina bifida. Patchy distribution of clinical findings
of tethered cord syndrome The pattern of clinical findings of spinal cord
tethering often fails to follow strict dermatomal patterns like
those due to compression of one or two nerve roots or a particular
level of spinal cord injury. Weakness, pain and other signs of spinal
cord tethering may have a patchy distribution below the level of
the lesion, rather than a strict neurotomal pattern. Pain in spinal cord tethering Regardless of the cause, the characteristics
of the associated pain are often suggestive of spinal tethering
(Table 3).
While other causes of back pain, such as disc herniation, need to
be excluded, clinicians still need to organise urgent neurosurgical
referral and assessment to ensure that spinal cord tethering is
not missed. Other common findings in tethered cord syndrome As highlighted above, the findings need to be
considered in the context of any pre-existing neurological abnormalities,
but clinicians should have a low threshold for specialist referral
when there are any changes in
pre-existing clinical findings (Table 4).
Management Diagnostic imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the best
currently available technique for viewing the spinal cord. Most
people with spina bifida will have some MRI findings suggestive
of spinal tethering, but the decision to treat is based upon a combination
of MRI and clinical findings. Ideally, a baseline MRI should be
taken on all young people and adults with spina bifida to compare
any changes with subsequent imaging, should symptoms of tethering
arise (Figure 5). Typical MRI findings in spinal cord tethering Typical MRI findings in spinal cord tethering
include:
thick filum terminale (>2 mm in diameter)
presence of structures such as fibrolipomatous filum terminale
obliteration of subarachnoid space suggesting caudal spinal
cord or nerve root adhesion
changes in the structure of the spina bifida lesion such
as dermoid, epidermoid cyst, myelomeningocoele, lipomyelomeningocoele
or other problem
elongation of spinal cord
posterior displacement of conus medullaris with the filum
pressing against the thecal lining at or near L5, or when compared
with previous films.
Surgical intervention Indications for detethering the cord Once the diagnosis of spinal cord tethering is
made, the decision for surgical intervention is based on clinical
evidence. Treatment is especially indicated in the presence of new
or worsening symptoms.
In studies of adults, when performed by experienced neurosurgeons,
spinal cord tethering has been demonstrated to be a well tolerated,
effective intervention.
Ultimately, the neurosurgeon can only confirm the presence of spinal
tethering at operation. The surgery performed depends upon the intraoperative
findings. Effect of surgical intervention on spinal
cord tethering Timely surgical intervention of tethered cord
syndrome can arrest, and in some cases improve neurological signs.
The more long standing the neurological signs, the less the chance
of resolution of symptoms and signs.
Pain improves in many people and is usually relieved within three
months of the detethering, but improvements in neurological signs
can take many more months.
Patients need constant monitoring after the operation to assess
recovery and help to adjust to any lifestyle changes.
Case history: a 27 year
old woman with worsening incontinence. M is a 27 year woman with spina bifida.
She is independently mobile, has never used calipers, has
no hydrocephalus, is fully employed, and is in a steady relationship
M presents with 12 months of progressively worsening faecal
incontinence. She is now freely incontinent of faeces and
manually evacuates herself before going out to avoid humiliation.
On examination, the anal tone is grossly reduced and at the
time of assessment, anal sphincter reconstruction was being
considered. She has also had mild urinary frequency and urgency
for six months, as well as eight months of reduced vaginal
sensation during intercourse. Her MRI demonstrated the presence
of a tethered cord with a large neural placode. M was referred
to a neurosurgeon and detethering is now planned.